On Dienstag, November 5, 2002, at 11:24 Uhr, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>>> The HAS_CRYPT_R is true because the function is available even
>>> without the
>>> prototype, but the struct is not. A plain bug in Perl's configury
>>> mechanism.
>>
>> Yeah, that's true. The question is whether it's worth working around
>> the bug. IMHO, yes -- but what do other people think?
>
> With no motion on this, I assume we are going to call this a perl bug
> and not work around it for 7.3.
I've only just subscribed to this list, so I don't know all of the
discussion
(given time, I'll look it up in the archives). But if you have found a
perl
bug, particularly one of configuration, I'm sure the perl developers
would
be grateful if you could report it to the perl5-porters list
(http://lists.perl.org/showlist.cgi?name=perl5-porters).
Or I could report it on your behalf, if you don't want to subscribe and
unsubscribe and all that.
Thank you,
Marcel
