Re: BUG #5118: start-status-insert-fatal - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #5118: start-status-insert-fatal
Date
Msg-id 7164.1255708085@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #5118: start-status-insert-fatal  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: BUG #5118: start-status-insert-fatal
List pgsql-bugs
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> It seems like pg_ping (client utility and related postmaster support)
> should be a discrete patch.  Improvements to pg_ctl and init scripts
> would come later, as separate patches?

Sounds sane to me.  Alternatively, do the postmaster support and make
the presumably-minor pg_ctl mods to use it, and then a standalone
pg_ping utility could come later.  I'm not sure how big the utility
would be, but surely bigger than the delta in pg_ctl.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5118: start-status-insert-fatal
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5118: start-status-insert-fatal