Re: LOST REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: LOST REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY
Date
Msg-id 7156.1096931488@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LOST REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY  ("Jimmie H. Apsey" <japsey@futuredental.com>)
Responses Re: LOST REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY
List pgsql-general
"Jimmie H. Apsey" <japsey@futuredental.com> writes:
>> I'd recommend an upgrade to 7.4.5 at your earliest convenience.
>>
> I have kept up-to-date our Red Hat kernels as you can probably see from
> the Linux 2.4.9-e.49smp kernel.  Am I required to maintain my own
> version of Postgres alongside and compiled into Red Hat's latest and
> greatest kernel?  If that's true, WHEW!

Unfortunately I don't get to dictate Red Hat's backwards-compatibility
policies :-( ... and their policy for AS 2.1 is that it's gonna be
Postgres 7.1 till it dies.  This means that anything that's
fundamentally unfixable without an initdb is going to remain broken.

> I wonder what version of
> Postgres is installed in Red Hat's latest kernel of AS 3.0?

RHEL3 uses the PG 7.3 release series, which is a little behind the times
but far less likely to eat your data than 7.1.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mage
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql 8 beta document
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql 8 beta document