Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced?
Date
Msg-id 7151.1113283494@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced?  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> Is PostgreSQL supposed to enforce a LATIN1/ISO-8859-1 encoding if that's 
> the database encoding?

AFAIK, there are no illegal characters in 8859-1, except \0 which we
do reject.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: System vs non-system casts
Next
From: Rémi Zara
Date:
Subject: Re: NetBSD mac68k crashing on union regression test