Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check
Date
Msg-id 7108.1159975396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Let me finish investigating the 2.x series and get back to you on that.

2.1 indeed seems to be the only version that emits the busted semicolon.
I found that 2.2 and 2.3 both fail one of their "make check" tests on my
machine --- if that's widespread it might explain a slow uptake rate for
these versions :-(.  But the failure is in one of the GLR tests and
shouldn't affect us.  All four 2.x versions produce gram.c files that
compile and pass regression for me.

So I'd vote for "allow 1.875 and up, except 2.1 specifically".
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check
Next
From: Markus Schaber
Date:
Subject: Re: timestamptz alias