Re: One process per session lack of sharing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From AMatveev@bitec.ru
Subject Re: One process per session lack of sharing
Date
Msg-id 710229794.20160715145520@bitec.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: One process per session lack of sharing  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi


> If amatveev (username, unsure of full name) wants to improve
> PL/PgSQL performance and the ability of a JVM to share resources
> between backends, then it would be more productive to focus on that than on threading.

Note, I've statred this post with
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/409604420.20160711111532%40bitec.ru#409604420.20160711111532@bitec.ru

Oracle: about 5M
MSSqlServer: about 4M
postgreSql: about 160М


It's 11K loc of pgSql.

And our code base is more than 4000k(for pgSql) lines of code.





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: One process per session lack of sharing
Next
From: AMatveev@bitec.ru
Date:
Subject: Re: One process per session lack of sharing