On 1/26/26 11:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> After further consideration, I think it is best to leave this alone as
> is. One particular problem is that Pointer is part of the documented
> API of GIN, and if we either remove it or rename it, then this would
> create a bunch of work for extensions to keep their code compiling
> across major versions.
Seems like something which is easy for extension authors to fix. As an
extension author myself I do not mind simple clean breaks like this. It
is the moe subtle breaks that are painful.
Andreas
