Re: PSQL performance - TPS - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Gavin Flower
Subject Re: PSQL performance - TPS
Date
Msg-id 70b70f43-f91f-2dd1-fc67-dbc0fdffa9a4@archidevsys.co.nz
Whole thread Raw
In response to PSQL performance - TPS  (Shital A <brightuser2019@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PSQL performance - TPS  (Shital A <brightuser2019@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 01/08/2019 15:10, Shital A wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are working on development of an application with postgresql 9.6 as 
> backend. Application as a whole is expected to give an throughput of 
> 100k transactions per sec. The transactions are received by DB from 
> component firing DMLs in ad-hoc fashion i.e. the commits are fired 
> after random numbers of transaction like 2,3,4. There is no bulk 
> loading of records. DB should have HA setup in active passive 
> streaming replication. We are doing a test setup on a 8-core machine 
> having 16 GB RAM. Actual HW will be better.
>
> Need help in:
> 1. On this env(8core cpu, 16GB) what is the TPS that we can expect? We 
> have tested with a simple Java code firing insert and commit in a loop 
> on a simple table with one column. We get 1200 rows per sec. If we 
> increase threads RPS decrease.
>
> 2. We have tuned some DB params like shared_buffers, sync_commit off, 
> are there any other pointers to tune DB params?
>
>
> Thanks.

Curious, why not use a more up-to-date version of Postgres, such 11.4?   
As more recent versions tend to run faster and to be better optimised!

You also need to specify the operating system!  Hopefully you are 
running a Linux or Unix O/S!


Cheers,
Gavin





pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Shital A
Date:
Subject: PSQL performance - TPS
Next
From: Shital A
Date:
Subject: Re: PSQL performance - TPS