On Mar 24, 2005, at 12:42 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> There could be some tricky bits around making a deferrable constraint
> not
> deferrable. And disabling a constraint would be nice too, reenabling
> it would
> require rechecking but at least it would eliminate the error-prone
> manual
> process of reentering the definition.
>
there are some tricky bits. check the archives for either this list or
the performance list for what I did to mark my reference checks
deferrable. it was within the last few months (no more than 6).
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.
+1-301-869-4449 x806
