Re: Type scale returned by PQfmod() 65531 for time/timestamp output parameter? - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Type scale returned by PQfmod() 65531 for time/timestamp output parameter?
Date
Msg-id 7047.1519056383@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Type scale returned by PQfmod() 65531 for time/timestamp outputparameter?  (Sebastien FLAESCH <sf@4js.com>)
Responses Re: Type scale returned by PQfmod() 65531 for time/timestamp outputparameter?  (Sebastien FLAESCH <sf@4js.com>)
List pgsql-interfaces
Sebastien FLAESCH <sf@4js.com> writes:
> On 02/16/2018 04:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You could try running it through the typmodout function for the column's
>> datatype.  I don't offhand know of any built-in types for which that would
>> be a really plausible typmod, though.  Are you sure your client code isn't
>> mistakenly narrowing it to int16 somewhere?

> As I wrote in my initial mail, I do the following:

> #define VARHDRSZ 4
>      int pgfmod = PQfmod(st->pgResult, i);
>      int pgprec = (pgfmod >> 16);
>      int pgscal = ((pgfmod - VARHDRSZ) & 0xffff);
>      int pgleng = (pgfmod - VARHDRSZ);

That might --- I don't recall offhand --- be the right decoding for
the typmod of a column of type NUMERIC.  It's certainly not right
for any other datatype.  Also, you don't seem to be accounting for
the fact that negative typmod always means "no typmod specified".

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Sebastien FLAESCH
Date:
Subject: Re: Type scale returned by PQfmod() 65531 for time/timestamp outputparameter?
Next
From: Sebastien FLAESCH
Date:
Subject: Re: Type scale returned by PQfmod() 65531 for time/timestamp outputparameter?