Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
Date
Msg-id 7003.1273705342@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Now that it only targets the packaged version, I can do with a single
> shared object, but maybe it needs to be more generic, like
> pg_upgrade_tools.so or something like that.

+1 for pg_upgrade_tools or pg_upgrade_support or some such name.

> I realize we need a separate pgxs makefile for the executable and shared
> libraries.  My question was whether the shared library directory should
> be under /contrib or under /contrib/pg_upgrade.

It has to be directly under /contrib, because the MSVC build scripts
only look there for contrib modules to build.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts