Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart
Date
Msg-id 6r37jr5f5cfwve3tycgvmasxdfih3xv7jfua24ewt7ebnh4sn2@vzxf5ngdkgmb
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Changing shared_buffers without restart  (Jack Ng <Jack.Ng@huawei.com>)
Responses RE: Changing shared_buffers without restart
List pgsql-hackers
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 03:18:10PM +0000, Jack Ng wrote:
> Just brain-storming here... would moving NBuffers to shared memory solve this specific issue? Though I'm pretty sure
thatwould open up a new set of synchronization issues elsewhere, so I'm not sure if there's a net gain.
 

It's in fact already happening, there is a shared structure that
described the resize status. But if I get everything right, it doesn't
solve all the problems.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects