Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?
Date
Msg-id 6f2f4c0f09867cd7bb56742fd43f2b6f624d8325.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 00:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I'm not that thrilled with inventing a new time type just for this,
> either.  However, time_t is not very fit for purpose, so do you
> have a different suggestion?

No, I don't have a great alternative, so I don't object to your
solutions for f5e4dedfa8.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with the PRNG used by Postgres
Next
From: Stepan Neretin
Date:
Subject: Re: Sort functions with specialized comparators