Re: anonymous unions (C11) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joel Jacobson
Subject Re: anonymous unions (C11)
Date
Msg-id 6ea949fe-6a65-4769-ba26-57c290205329@app.fastmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to anonymous unions (C11)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025, at 11:38, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is another patch set to sprinkle some C11 features around the
> code.  My aim is to make a little bit of use of several C11 features
> as examples and encouragement for future code, and to test compilers
> (although we're not yet at the point where this should really stress
> any compiler).

Nice, didn't know about this C11 feature.

I've eyeballed the entire output of `git diff --word-diff-regex=.` and can't see any oddities.

I've also run the full test suite and it passes.

/Joel



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix overflow of nbatch
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream