Re: [pgsql-general] In memory tables/databases - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alexander Todorov
Subject Re: [pgsql-general] In memory tables/databases
Date
Msg-id 6e97ff300707011614p72f7d779g31abb6171fa6b902@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-general] In memory tables/databases  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-general] In memory tables/databases  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On 7/2/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:55:11PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> So mount a ramdisk and initdb in there.
>
> > You could also put a tablespace on a ramdisk and create the table
> > there.

Thanks for this hint. That looks like what I was looking for.

>
> The fresh-initdb approach is more likely to work without any strange
> corner cases.  If you try a setup where the system catalogs are on
> persistent storage but you have a tablespace on ramdisk, then after
> restart you'll have pg_class entries referencing files that don't exist
> anymore, which I believe will provoke errors.

I believe error will occur if trying to access these objects. To avoid
this pg_dump/pg_restore may be useful and recreating the
tables/indexes after restart.
This will emulate the MySQL behaviour where tables definitions is kept
on disk and contents kept in memory.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-general] In memory tables/databases
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-general] In memory tables/databases