Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Date
Msg-id 6db86e0b-697a-4e4b-860a-7ad9736a8e81@postgresfriends.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 27/09/2025 18:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> So according to the standard, this:
>
>     select a+b, count(*) from ... group by all;
>
> would be invalid because a+b couldn't be written directly in
> GROUP BY?


Correct.


> I can't see us rejecting that though, since we do
> allow a+b in GROUP BY.


No, nor do I.  Also, there were rumors about adding expressions to group 
by in the standard but no formal proposal yet.


FWIW, I opposed adding this GROUP BY ALL feature, but I was 
outnumbered.  I hope to never see it in production.

-- 

Vik Fearing




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals
Next
From: Arseniy Mukhin
Date:
Subject: Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows