Re: Add log_autovacuum_{vacuum|analyze}_min_duration - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From kasaharatt
Subject Re: Add log_autovacuum_{vacuum|analyze}_min_duration
Date
Msg-id 6c5324e219476e8bd8aa220001f2eb87@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add log_autovacuum_{vacuum|analyze}_min_duration  (Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

2025-08-14 13:26 に Shinya Kato wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 5:44 PM kasaharatt <kasaharatt@oss.nttdata.com>
> wrote:
>
>> >>>> > Approach 2:
>> >>>> > - log_autovacuum_min_duration: Changed behavior, which controls only
>> >>>> > autovacuum logging.
>> >>>> > - log_autoanalyze_min_duration: New parameter, which controls
>> >>>> > autoanalyze logging.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My vote is for this approach. It is probably OK to change the
>> >>>> behavior of
>> >>>> log_autovacuum_min_duration, as the new GUC will have the same
>> >>>> default
>> >>>> value.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank you for voting. I also think this approach is reasonable to
>> >>> implement.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> A new patch is attached.
>> >> Thoughts?
>> I reviewed this patch.
>> I also have no particular objections to the Approach 2.
>
> Thank you for the review!
>
>> > +    <term><literal>log_autoanalyze_min_duration</literal>,
>> > <literal>toast.log_autoanalyze_min_duration</literal>(<type>integer</type>)
>> (snip)
>> > +       "toast.log_autoanalyze_min_duration",
>> This patch adds the log_autoanalyze_min_duration parameter fot TOAST
>> tables.
>> However since PostgreSQL currently does not support ANALYZE on TOAST
>> tables,
>> isn't this parameter unnecessary?
>
> You're right; that was a mistake. I've fixed it in the v4 patch.
Thanks for the patch updating.

> Additionally, I removed the above setting from the test files in
> src/test/modules/xid_wraparound/t/ (001_emergency_vacuum.pl,
> 002_limits.pl, 003_wraparounds.pl). The reason is that these tests
> check for autovacuum logs, not autoanalyze logs. You can run the test
> with the following command:
> make check -C src/test/modules/xid_wraparound
> PG_TEST_EXTRA='xid_wraparound'
Yeah, I agree that.

I confirmed this patch could apply to HEAD and all make check tests were
passed.
I've manually tested it in a few different ways, and it's working as
expected so far.

Unless there are any objections from others, I think I can mark this
patch as "Ready for Committer".

Best regards,
--
Kasahara Tatsuhito
NTT DATA Japan Corporation



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Maksim.Melnikov"
Date:
Subject: Re: Panic during xlog building with big values
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: Making jsonb_agg() faster