Re: name difference of rpm packages of postgresql-private-devel-16.6.z - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: name difference of rpm packages of postgresql-private-devel-16.6.z
Date
Msg-id 6c2822ee38cd6df4ebf26a2becc60c8ddd850059.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to name difference of rpm packages of postgresql-private-devel-16.6.z  (Ravi Dave <royrvd.dave@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 2024-12-30 at 16:53 +0530, Ravi Dave wrote:
> Out of curiosity, I wanted to know the meaning of "private" in postgresql-private-devel-16.6.
> rpm package name. Ideally, I saw postgresql-devel-* rpm packages, so I want to know if there
> is any specific reason for he word private in the name of rpm.

The "private" package was not downloaded from the PostgreSQL download page,
so we don't know anything about it.  Probably somebody packaged it for -
well - private use.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unexpected results from a query with UNION ALL
Next
From: Jan Behrens
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path for PL/pgSQL functions partially cached?