Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Does a cancelled REINDEX CONCURRENTLY need to be messy? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Does a cancelled REINDEX CONCURRENTLY need to be messy?
Date
Msg-id 6b9437e7-7b0d-f5c9-813c-00709c3111f7@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Does a cancelled REINDEX CONCURRENTLY need to be messy?  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 03.07.23 19:46, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> Well, I definitely agree that it would be useful to have*something*
> that automatically removes debris

Yeah, like "undo".

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support function for containment operators