Re: [HACKERS] pgstattuple documentation clarification - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pgstattuple documentation clarification
Date
Msg-id 6b515dcd-b55f-e13e-e8e7-7d65138a33fd@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pgstattuple documentation clarification  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 12/21/2016 09:04 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Yes, I agree. In any case, before we change anything can we agree on a 
> description of what we currently do?
>
> Here's a second attempt:
>
>    The table_len will always be greater than the sum of the tuple_len,
>    dead_tuple_len and free_space. The difference is accounted for by
>    fixed page overhead, the per-page table of pointers to tuples, and
>    padding to ensure that tuples are correctly aligned.
>


In the absence of further comment I will proceed along these lines.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical decoding on standby
Next
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans