Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Drouvot, Bertrand
Subject Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Date
Msg-id 6b187db9-1513-434b-b0da-82c3da2ba31c@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby  (Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 11/30/23 1:06 PM, Ajin Cherian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 8:17 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> 
> 3. If creation of a slot on the standby fails for one slot because a
> slot of the same name exists, then thereafter no new sync slots are
> created on standby. Is this expected? I do see that previously created
> slots are kept up to date, just that no new slots are created after
> that.

Yes this is the expected behavior as per discussion in [1].
Does this behavior make sense to you?

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/dd9dbbaf-ca77-423a-8d62-bfc814626b47%40gmail.com

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby