Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Vivek Khera
Subject Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon
Date
Msg-id 6ac440bd7e1a8252d76f28d57b6dddb5@khera.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Apr 20, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:

>> Realistically I don't think a 30k$ Dell is a something that needs to
>> be
>> junked. I am pretty sure if I got MSSQL running on it, it would
>> outperform
>> my two proc box. I can agree it may not have been the optimal
>> platform. My
>> decision is not based solely on the performance on the 4 proc box.
>
> Oh, certainly it's too late to buy a Sunfire or eServer instead.   You
> just
> could have gotten far more bang for the buck with some expert advice,
> that's
> all.   But don't bother with Dell support any further, they don't
> really have
> the knowledge to help you.
>

FWIW, I have a $20k Dell box (PE2650 with 14-disk external PowerVault
RAID enclosure) which I'm phasing out for a dual opteron box because it
can't handle the load.  It will be re-purposed as a backup system.
Damn waste of money, but complaining customers can cost more...

Trust me, it is likely your Dell hardware, as moving to the Opteron
system has improved performance tremendously with fewer disks.  Same
amount of RAM and other basic configurations.  Both have LSI based RAID
cards, even.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Disk filling, CPU filling, renegade inserts and deletes?
Next
From: Richard Plotkin
Date:
Subject: Re: Disk filling, CPU filling, renegade inserts and deletes?