On 6/6/23 22:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> (and, I predict, more than one security-grade bug).
*That* is what worries me the most
> I agree that if we were building this system from scratch today,
> we'd probably choose thread-per-session not process-per-session.
> But the costs of getting to that from where we are will be enormous.
> I seriously doubt that the net benefits could justify that work,
> no matter how long you want to look forward. It's not really
> significantly different from "let's rewrite the server in
> C++/Rust/$latest_hotness".
Agreed.
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com