Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Burd
Subject Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers
Date
Msg-id 6a30dafd-f63c-4877-9de2-0b456cf48fea@app.fastmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025, at 4:38 PM, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 12:27:25PM -0500, Greg Burd wrote:
>> Got it, fixed in v9.
>
> I tried to rearrange the s_lock.h changes to make it more obvious what is
> specific to AArch64.  WDYT?

Hey Nathan, thanks for taking another look and editing the patch!  Your version is much more concise, I like it.
Testingit now.
 

best.

-greg

> -- 
> nathan
>
> Attachments:
> * v10-0001-Enable-the-Microsoft-Windows-ARM64-MSVC-platform.patch



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Make copyObject work in C++
Next
From: "Greg Burd"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers