Bruce wrote:
> > I was never all that happy with the WAL chapter, since, as you say,
it
> > doesn't seem to be a first-class user-level feature. I'd be happy
to
> > integrate it into another chapter, but I'm not sure where.
>
> Sure, I am looking for suggestions. My relabeling at least fixes
that,
> but feel free to move things around and relabel them.
FWIW, I agree with Peter. We are supposed to be talking about Server
Administration, not architectural properties of the database
(reliability, performance, etc.). The proposed move takes things more
off-topic. In fact, IMO chapter 26 is already too fat and could provide
links to the 'benefits' and 'implementation details' portions (maybe
move to VII Internals?).
Merlin
