Re: Win32 signals & sockets - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: Win32 signals & sockets
Date
Msg-id 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A7527@Herge.rcsinc.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to Win32 signals & sockets  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Responses Re: Win32 signals & sockets  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> It's the increase in variance between the Unix and Windows code paths
> that's really bothering me.  We went into this project on the promise
> that there weren't going to be thousands of lines of #ifdef WIN32
stuff,
> and I'm not happy in the least with the way postmaster.c looks now,
let
> alone after applying this patch.

I've been following this thread for a bit and I have to admit I wouldn't
mind seeing the shmmem part of Magnus's patch go in.  Windows suffers vs
unix generally on process creation times and any improvement here would
be welcome.

Merlin

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 signals & sockets
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 signals & sockets