On Oct 6, 2025, at 06:30, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> IMO, the main docs would benefit greatly from the addition of
> PG_ABS_BUILDDIR, PG_ABS_BUILDDIR, PG_LIBDIR and PG_DLSUFFIX, which are
> still missing. These are available to extension developers through
> installcheck, and are a great way to write more flexible tests with
> arbitrary inputs, like a dependency to on-disk files. I would
> certainly +1 this addition, at least.
I’ve never heard of these! Seems like there’s an awful lot of stuff in the testing infrastructure that would be useful
todocument.
D
