Re: Replacing Ordinal Suffixes - Mailing list pgsql-general

From George Weaver
Subject Re: Replacing Ordinal Suffixes
Date
Msg-id 6C182921C33248E8AA7F4245FDA79141@D420
Whole thread Raw
In response to Replacing Ordinal Suffixes  ("George Weaver" <gweaver@shaw.ca>)
Responses Re: Replacing Ordinal Suffixes
List pgsql-general
> Actually, I found that the double backslashes are required whether the E
> is
> used or not:

>You must be using a relatively old PG version then.  Default behavior
>since around 9.1 has been that backslashes aren't special except
>in E'' strings.

Hmm.

development=# select version();
                           version
------------------------------------------------------------
 PostgreSQL 9.1.9, compiled by Visual C++ build 1500, 32-bit
(1 row)

>regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Replacing Ordinal Suffixes
Next
From: Karthik Segpi
Date:
Subject: PQunescapebytea not reverse of PQescapebytea?