Re: New regression test time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit kapila
Subject Re: New regression test time
Date
Msg-id 6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C38421BBF06@szxeml558-mbs.china.huawei.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New regression test time  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday, July 01, 2013 8:37 AM Josh Berkus wrote:
On 06/30/2013 12:33 AM, Amit kapila wrote:
>
> On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:37 AM Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>>> If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument.  But
>>>> we don't, so it's not.  And nobody has offered to write a feature to
>>>> split our tests either.
>
>>> I have done a POC. See:
>
>>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1170
>
>> I think it is better to submit for next commit fest which is at below link:
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=19

> I would argue for doing this in this CF, just so that we can have the
> benefit of the extra tests for the next 3 months, and so that Andrew can
> work on the buildfarm additions.

My mail was just a suggestion, as in general after start of CF all new patch submissions for review
are done in next CF.
However as for this particular patch, there are quite a few other dependent patches, so it will be good
if this patch gets committed in this CF only.
Also as a CFM, you are better person to decide about it.


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Display number of changed rows since last analyze
Next
From: Albe Laurenz
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Display number of changed rows since last analyze