Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit kapila
Subject Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management
Date
Msg-id 6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C383BC786B2@szxeml509-mbx
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management  (Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
Responses Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management  (Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday, November 19, 2012 8:52 PM Amit kapila wrote:
On Monday, November 19, 2012 5:53 AM Jeff Janes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, October 20, 2012 11:03 PM Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>>Run the modes in reciprocating order?
>>> Sorry, I didn't understood this, What do you mean by modes in reciprocating order?


>> By reciprocating, I mean to run them in the reverse order, or in random order.

> Today for some configurations, I have ran by reciprocating the order.

The detailed data for all other various configuration is attached with this mail.

> The 2 problems which are observed in V-Tune Profiler Reports for Buffer Management are:
> a. Partition Lock
> b. Buf-Free List Lock

> Tommorow, I will send you some of the profiler reports for different scenario where the above is observed.

   Still not able to prepare reoprt. Shall try tommorow.


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.3] OAT_POST_ALTER object access hooks
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.3] OAT_POST_ALTER object access hooks