On Monday, November 12, 2012 8:23 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, November 08, 2012 10:42 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, November 08, 2012 2:04 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> >> On 19.10.2012 14:42, Amit kapila wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday, October 18, 2012 8:49 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>> >> >> Before implementing the timeout parameter, I think that it's
>> better
>> >> to change
>> >> >> both pg_basebackup background process and pg_receivexlog so that
>>> BTW, IIRC the walsender has no timeout mechanism during sending
>>> backup data to pg_basebackup. So it's also useful to implement the
>> timeout mechanism for the walsender during backup.
>
>> Yes, its useful, but for walsender the main problem is that it uses blocking
>> send call to send the data.
>> I have tried using tcp_keepalive settings, but the send call doesn't comeout
>> incase of network break.
>> The only way I could get it out is:
>> change in the corresponding file /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_retries2 by using
>> the command
> echo "8" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_retries2
>> As per recommendation, its value should be at-least 8 (equivalent to 100
>> sec)
>
>> Do you have any idea, how it can be achieved?
> What about using pq_putmessage_noblock()?
I will try this, but do you know why at first place in code the blocking mode is used to send files?
I am asking as I am little scared that it should not break any design which was initially thought of while making send
offiles as blocking.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
