Re: pg_regress starting postmaster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: pg_regress starting postmaster
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FBD6@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_regress starting postmaster  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Responses Re: pg_regress starting postmaster  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> subject says it all. pg_regress starts "postmaster"
> (pg_regress.c, line 1515). Shouldn't this be "postgres" these days?
>
> (Yes, I'm aware that I wrote that code ;-) But this just occurred to
> me..)

Actually, a second thought given that I was just bitten by the
run-tests-as-admin-doesn't-work - should we use pg_ctl to start it?

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: pg_regress starting postmaster
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_regress starting postmaster