> > Thing is, we already have both of these things set up using
> Gavin Roy's
> > code. So I'd see it as a big waste of time for the WWW
> team to hack them
> > toghter just to save a domain.
> >
>
> Also, the WWW team doesn't have the resources to keep up with
> the likely volume of content changes that will happen on this
> site from a week to week and month to month basis.
>
> Unlike www which is a fairly static site, the funds site will
> likely change often.
Now, I would like to see that as an argument *for* integrating it -
simply because that would give more hands working on the day-to-day
parts of -www. Which definitly wouldn't be a bad thing.
But I'm certainly not going to push it...
//Magnus
