Re: Windows 2000 Support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Windows 2000 Support
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FB48@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows 2000 Support  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Windows 2000 Support
List pgsql-hackers
> > I am worried that saying required means it only works for that
> > version, while it might work for SP5 if that is ever released.
> >
> How about:
>
> Windows 2000 SP4 and above required.

Yeah, that's better wording. Or more correct I think "Windows 2000 SP4
or above".

FWIW, MS has officially said at some point that they will not make SP5
for Windows 2000, but they've changed their minds before...


> I know it seems trivial, but the amount of people that run
> windows.... I really don't want to spend a ton of time with
> the question:  I see that Sp4 is supported, what about SP3? :)

Well, SP3 isn't supported ;-)

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump schema breakup
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using