Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FB39@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
List pgsql-hackers
> > >>Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers,
> > >>threading doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this
> > >>refers to at all.
> > >
> > >Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
> > >either.  Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
> > >revert to the old way?
> >
> > I'd vote for reverting to the old way. Anyone serious about hacking
> > should be on both lists.

Then why bother with two different lists?

If developers need to be on both list (which I beleive they do), and the
focus of both lists is developers, then why not just remove one of them
and get rid of the problem?

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using