Re: postgres and ldap - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: postgres and ldap
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FA2E@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgres and ldap  ("Samad, Alex" <alexander.samad@hp.com>)
Responses Re: postgres and ldap  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
> > > 8.2 will have direct LDAP authentication without PAM.
> >
> > That code's going to go away real soon if some
> documentation doesn't
> > show up.  I can't believe Bruce was sloppy enough to accept
> a feature
> > patch with zero documentation.
>
> ?? I thought I had sent in the docs for that. Will dig
> through my notes when I get home to resubmit. (I have
> certainly written it, because my local docs copy has it!)

Actually, the docs *were* submitted. See
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/msg00375.php.
Applied per
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-03/msg00080.php, I
think it's just the docs that were missed.

I don't recall any feedback about updating them, so I think that patch
still stands.

//Magnus

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres and ldap
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fabian Pascal and RDBMS deficiencies in fully