Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E7A9@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
List pgsql-hackers
> > > OK, running the latest patch.  Observations:
> > > ...
> > > I ran tests for about an hour, randomly killing/canceling
> backends
> > > without any problems.
> >
> > Are we all comfortable that
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01009.php
> > is OK to apply?
>
> Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list).
> I'd vote with my own servers anyways.

Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
until now.

Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
is.

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition