> > As for the libxml2/msxml - I think going with *just* libxml2 is the
> > way to go. The APIs are so completely different that it
> would be two
> > completely different implementations. And AFAIK, there are
> no problems
> > with libxml on Win32 in general.
Here's a version that uses libxml2 natively, including updated unix
build scripts. No longer any dependency on wxxml2.
//Magnus
