> >>On this we clearly disagree (on the value of the feature, that is).
> >>But that's your choice, of course. I'll keep running with it myself
> >>until such a time as an alternative exists.
> >>Let's, as they say, agree to disagree on it.
> >
> >
> > FWIW, I do think this would be a nice feature, and would
> tie in nicely
> > with an idea I've been mulling over of having a centralised library
> > site for SQL snippets.
>
> As we now have a postgres database, this should be the
> central repository for stuff like this. No need for XML here...
Using the postgres database ties me to one server. I run the same
queries against many different servers - which one are you going to
store them in?
//Magnus
