>> I was also hoping to piggyback the socket fix on top of this
>> infrastructure. And that *requires* the
>write-files-after-createprocess
>> method. There is no other way.
>
>Oh, I had forgotten about that part of the problem. Okay, just gotta
>hold our noses and do it I guess.
>
>(Just to be clear: the plan is CreateProcess in suspended state, then
>write_backend_variables, then start the child's thread, right?
>Otherwise seems you got a race condition.)
Right, that's the plan.
I'll see what I can get together over the next couple of days.
//Magnus
