> > I think Win2000 or XP would be a reasonable restriction for
> Win32 PG
> > installations that want tablespaces.
>
> FWIW, this restriction is already in place because of using
> named pipes in the signal implementation.
Not at all. We support NT4 as well. (And 2003. But that one support
junctions in the same way 2000/XP does)
But I agree that "no non-default tablespaces on NT4" is a reasonable
restriction.
> Also, Interix supports unix style symlinks which offers a
> choice to win32 administrators.
My definite guess is that it's implemented using NTFS junctions (since
it's still NTFS being used, right?). Just with a different API on top...
Interix also supports only 2000 + 2003, and not NT4, last time I
checked.
//Magnus
