On Nov 26, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Jeff Larsen wrote:
> Yes, but I'd like something better than "near real time" as the above
> page describes. Or maybe someone could clarify that.... Besides,
> EnterpriseDB does not save me enough money. In my current commercial
> DB, if a transaction is committed on the master, it is guaranteed to
> be committed to the secondary. In our business, losing one customer
> order could lose us the customer for good.
So you want synchronous replication. Search on that term in the
archives for possible solutions (or lack thereof) in postgres.
If you don't specify your requirements clearly, don't expect useful
advice ;-)
