Re: pg_autovacuum in PG9.x - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Brett Mc Bride
Subject Re: pg_autovacuum in PG9.x
Date
Msg-id 6B4535F762F52045B0A0221F6116305254554325@mbox-f-1.du.deakin.edu.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_autovacuum in PG9.x  (David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net>)
List pgsql-performance

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of David Kerr
Sent: Wednesday, 4 April 2012 11:37 AM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: [PERFORM] pg_autovacuum in PG9.x

Howdy,

What is/is there a replacement for pg_autovacuum in PG9.0+ ?

I haven't had much luck looking for it in the docs.

Thanks!

Dave

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Hi Dave,
It's part of core now: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/routine-vacuuming.html#AUTOVACUUM

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Istvan Endredy
Date:
Subject: bad planning with 75% effective_cache_size
Next
From: Kim Hansen
Date:
Subject: Planner selects slow "Bitmap Heap Scan" when "Index Scan" is faster