On Feb 17, 2010, at 4:28 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
>> Yes, but if it's a variadic function, I suspect that it won't often be
>> called with the same number of args. So you'd potentially end up
>> caching a lot of extra stuff that would never be used again.
>
> Potentially. Patches welcome!
GitHub. ;-P
> Umm, perhaps F->funcname(@args), or PG->funcname(@args), or ... ?
>
> Anyone got any better suggestions?
PG is good. Or maybe DB?
>> By the way, I think it needs some documentation explaining how to load it inside PL/Perl.
>
> I thought about that, and started to write it, but dropped it for now.
> I'll wait till my "cunning plan" to share code with the Safe compartment
> (aka PostgreSQL::PLPerl::Injector) is done then document how call() can
> be used in both plperlu and plperl.
Ah, okay.
Best,
David
