Re: use of OID.Unknown - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: use of OID.Unknown
Date
Msg-id 6A9030FD-2EB3-4D8C-8A6D-6897EAD27A3A@fastcrypt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: use of OID.Unknown  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: use of OID.Unknown
List pgsql-jdbc
It's my impression that we don't get near the level of testing that
the server does. Most people only download whatever we tag as stable.
In other words our real testing cycle occurs once a release has been
made.

This is really a one line change in the code, now how it interacts
with the backend is certainly more complex.

Dave

On 8-Nov-05, at 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
>> Before we cut an 8.1 stable release, I'd like to revisit the use of
>> unknown for strings at a minimum.
>
> Isn't it *way* too late to be revisiting such questions for 8.1?
>
> I'd be fairly worried about breaking cases that work conveniently
> today.  It sounds like something to experiment with during a devel
> cycle, not to cram in at the last moment with no field testing.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: use of OID.Unknown
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: use of OID.Unknown