Re: Vacuum statistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alena Rybakina
Subject Re: Vacuum statistics
Date
Msg-id 69e99101-a308-468f-b895-8057305699bf@yandex.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum statistics  (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 16.03.2026 17:27, Andrey Borodin wrote:

>> On 16 Mar 2026, at 17:11, Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>
>> I moved the tests there. Regression tests are unfortunately not an option because the statistics are not stable.
> I think there's no need to test for correct numbers. It would be totally enough
> to just for sane numbers or even any numbers at all.
> If the test just invokes the function without segfaulting - that's already by far
> better than no test at all.
>
> Of course, test that verifies expected behavior is better, if it's possible.

I think last version is stable - it is in the isolation test. The last 
version is here 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/68939c47-fa0c-4198-853a-92d1390079da%40yandex.ru

-- 
-----------
Best regards,
Alena Rybakina




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Greg Burd"
Date:
Subject: Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN: showing ReadStream / prefetch stats