Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Date
Msg-id 69b3ee85-50c6-c2f3-3501-b7a10e0b3b99@berkus.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08/22/2017 11:04 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> WARNING:  what you did is ok, but you might have wanted to do something else
> 
> First of all, whether or not that can properly be called a warning is
> highly debatable.  Also, if you do that sort of thing to your spouse
> and/or children, they call it "nagging".  I don't think users will
> like it any more than family members do.

Realistically, we'll support the backwards-compatible syntax for 3-5
years.  Which is fine.

I suggest that we just gradually deprecate the old syntax from the docs,
and then around Postgres 16 eliminate it.  I posit that that's better
than changing the meaning of the old syntax out from under people.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Serge Rielau
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Silent bug in transformIndexConstraint
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Out of date comment in predicate.c