RE: PG on a web-server...issues..and some general qu estions on PG deployment - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Clark, Joel
Subject RE: PG on a web-server...issues..and some general qu estions on PG deployment
Date
Msg-id 69F195289743D411B428009027E293C402671096@CLTEXCH1
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-interfaces
I think you get a persistent connection per httpd process, no?  If this
really is the case, you could then limit your connection count by limiting
the number of times that apache will spawn a new process (10 is default,
IIRC)  This isn't exactly true pooling, but should be flexible enough to
meet the intent...  :)

Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Samplonius [mailto:tom@sdf.com]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 11:39 AM
To: Adam Lang
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] PG on a web-server...issues..and some general
questions on PG deployment



On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Adam Lang wrote:

> > 3. Is PHP/Postgres module capable of server side connection pooling?
> 
> Yes.
 The PHP docs are very clear to not referr to it is pooling, but
persistant connections.  They are very different things.  PHP as a whole
is not capable of pooling, because a separate instance of PHP runs in each
httpd process, and those instances can not shared database connections
between them.

Tom


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Tom Samplonius
Date:
Subject: Re: PG on a web-server...issues..and some general questions on PG deployment
Next
From: Michael Sims
Date:
Subject: ODBC on Solaris