Re: Remove redundant extra_desc info for enum GUC variables? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Remove redundant extra_desc info for enum GUC variables?
Date
Msg-id 6998.1211912684@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove redundant extra_desc info for enum GUC variables?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Remove redundant extra_desc info for enum GUC variables?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> One point of interest is that for client_min_messages and
>> log_min_messages, the ordering of the values has significance, and
>> it's different for the two cases.

> Is there any actual reason why they're supposed to be treated
> differently?

Yeah: LOG level sorts differently in the two cases; it's fairly high
priority for server log output and much lower for client output.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ERRORDATA_STACK_SIZE panic crashes on Windows
Next
From: "Alex Hunsaker"
Date:
Subject: Re: Hiding undocumented enum values?