The jdbc inserts go into the main parent table and check constraints
redirect them to child tables.
If I were to drop the rule, that would immediately affect the inserts
and they would go the the parent table. And I cannot lock the parent due
to the problem I mentioned earlier.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:38 PM
To: Sriram Dandapani
Cc: Matthew T. O'Connor; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] autovacuum ignore tables
"Sriram Dandapani" <sdandapani@counterpane.com> writes:
> Real question is: Why do the INSERTS go into wait state as soon as the
> lock table statement is issued on the parent?
If you were just inserting directly into other child tables, a lock on
either the parent or the target child table shouldn't affect them.
I wonder if you are using conditional rules to redirect the inserts,
and the rules include a reference to the target table? If that's the
case, you really need to drop the relevant rule before you remove the
child table, anyway.
regards, tom lane